What do you know

The return of the Divine Empire

By:  Genie Ali

Moslem law copy droit

TERMS: RE: YOU

American—As applied to people, pertains to descendants of Europeans born in America, particularly the   

                    United  States. Bouv.


To understand who the United States are one must take a look at the term United States of America..

 

United States of America—uThe Republic who’s organic law is the constitution… Bouv.

 

uRepublic—vA Commonwealth. Bouv.

 

vCommonwealth— …sometimes used to designate wa republican form of government. Bouv.

The xpublic or common weal or ywelfare, za body politic; Blacks

 

wRepublican form of government— …a government by representatives chosen by the people. Bouv.

 

xPublic—The whole body politic, or all the citizens of the state. The inhabitants of a particular place.

Public applies to all citizens and every member of the state. Blacks

 

yPublic welfare—The Prosperity, well-being, or conveniences of the public at large, or of a whole community, as distinguished from the advantage of an individual or limited class. Blacks

 

(Welfare—Well-doing or well-being in any respect; the enjoyment of health and common blessings of life; exemption from any evil or calamity; prosperity; happiness)

 

zBody Politic—The collective body of a nation or state as politically organized or as exercising political

functions.

A term applied to a corporation, which is usually designated as a “body corporate and

politic.”      Blacks 3rd ed.

 

yProsperity—The condition of being prosperous; success, esp. financial successAmerican Heritage Dic.

 

yAt large—Representing a State or district in its entirety, as a delegate, elector, or Congressman at large.

Bouv.

 

yState—The section of territory occupied by one of the United States. Blacks

 

yDistrict—A certain portion of the country, separated from the rest for some special purpose.

The United States are divided into judicial districts, in each of which is established a district court;

they are also divided into election districts, collection districts, etc.

It may be construed to mean territory; and in the revenue laws the words “district” and “port” are 

often used in the same sense. Bouv.

 

yDelegate—A person elected, by the people of an organized territory of the United States, to congress, who has

a seat in congress and a right of debating, but not voting. Bouv.

 

yTerritory—A portion of the country subject to and belonging to the United States which is not within the

                      boundary of any State or the District of Columbia. Bouv.

 

wRepresentative—One who represents or is in the place of another. Bouv.

 

wPeople— …in constitutional law or discussion, it is often the case that those only who are intended who have a share in the government through being clothed with elective franchise,… For these and similar purposes, the electors, though constituting but a small minority of the whole body of the community; nevertheless act for all, and, as being for the time the representatives of sovereignty, they are considered and spoken of as the sovereign people. The term people of the United States is synonymous with citizens; both describe the political body, who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty, and who hold the power and conduct the government through their representatives. Bouv.

 

Elector—A duly qualified voter; … electors being properly applied to all those entitled to vote whereas “voters”

appropriately designates only those actually voting.

One of the persons chosen to comprise the electoral college.

Registered Qualified Elector- One possessing the constitutional qualifications, and registered under the

registration statute.

 

People of the United States—The sovereign people… Ballentines

 

So, the United States of America is a government of representatives termed electors, signifying a State meaning they are inhabitants of and are the State i.e. the States of California,.. who meet in the House of Representatives which equals/is the United States of America.

 

Within the definition of the term United States of America it states: Bouv.

 

…and the judicial power gives to the supreme court the right of interpreting them. But this court is but another name for the United States, and this power necessarily results from their sovereignty: for the United States would not be truly sovereign unless their interpretation as well as the letter of the law governed. 

 

…the supreme court, which is nothing else than the United States, is the rightful expositor. This necessarily results from their sovereignty. But the United States government is one of delegated powers; and nothing is better established… that a delegate can exercise only that power which is delegated to him.

 

So, the United States, the nine members of the supreme court, are sovereign. Each a delegate and a sovereign, a citizen of that body, the supreme court (United States), and the State wherein they reside, who’s job it is to interpret the constitution.

 

To give you more…

 

Union—A popular term for the United States of America. Bouv.

 

The Preamble to the Constitution reads: We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

 

Translated reads: We the Senate of the supreme court, in order to form a more perfect body of Representatives…do ordain and establish this constitution for this Republic.

 

This is an American government with its American Constitution i.e. a government of Europeans which is an institutional government.

 

This government has absolutely nothing to do with you unless you are one of them or of their family. Their Constitution was written for them and them only.

 

Consequently, the people of the State of.. are the electors whom are representatives of the supreme court (United States) and not you.

 

In order to be in this body, besides being European, you must be of the public and an inhabitant of a State within the United States (you must be elected into one of the supreme court justices territory i.e. State/District (zip code))

 

*Inhabitant—The inhabitants of the United States are either native or foreign born. The natives consist of first of white persons, citizens of the United States. Second, the aborigines, in general, not citizens of the United States. Third, negroes or descendants of the African race. Bouv.

 

Native—A natural-born subject or citizen; a denizen by birth… Bouv.

 

Natural-born subject—One born within the dominions, or rather within the allegiance, of the king of England. Bouv.

 

The Constitution of the United States, states: Article II; No person except a natural-born citizen at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.

 

Again, unless you are a European by the definitions above [subject to or owing allegiance], you cannot be the public, the people, a citizen nor president of the United States.

 

White person—…members of the white or Caucasian race, as distinct from black, red, yellow, and brown races.

This term, however, does not necessarily include all Caucasians. It is a  popular and not a

 scientific term, and must be given its popular meaning, and as such is not to be construed 

                         as identical with “Caucasian,” unless the latter term is given its popular meaning, as referring

                         to recognized racial distinctions existing at present, and not to possibly common ancestry of

                         dissimilar races. In its popular meaning, “white persons” refers to immigrants from the

                         British Isles and Northwestern Europe…  Blacks 3rd ed.

 

 

The definition above gives to you the meaning of “white persons” being immigrants from the British Isles and Northwestern Europe. The term popular by itself is not given in the dictionaries of law, but the following are given:

 

Popular sense: The sense in which a subject is understood by those conversant therewith. Bouv.

 

So, to understand this definition we go to Wikpedia:

 

The British Isles are a group of islands off the northwest coast of continental Europe that include Great Britain and Ireland, and numerous smaller islands. There are two sovereign states located on the islands: the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and Ireland. The British Isles also includes the Crown Dependencies of the *Isle of Man and, by tradition, the Channel Islands, although the latter are not physically a part of the island group.

 

North-west Europe:  Geographically it is almost always used to include the United Kingdom and Ireland; the northern and western parts of France and Germany; the Benelux countries; and Scandinavia (though possibly not Finland). It would normally exclude the Iberian peninsula, Italy; Switzerland, southern and eastern parts of France and Germany and Austria. This usage is helpful when discussing issues of climate or biology. Broadly speaking, it represents the area whose climate and biogeography is significantly modified by the Gulf Stream.

Socially, “North-West Europe” roughly corresponds to Germanic Europe, sharing some cultural traits (for example, a history of Protestantism and Germanic languages) that differentiate them from their Mediterranean Latin or Eastern European Slavic fellow-Europeans. This leads to much the same definition as the geographical one above, but would more definitely exclude France and southern Belgium. It would therefore be closer to the area normally defined as Northern Europe, excluding the Baltic and Finland.

 

Mooe—An officer in the Isle of Man similar to the English Bailiff. Bouv.

 

Moor—An officer in the Isle of Man, who summons the courts for the several sheadings. This office is similar

             to the English bailiff of a hundred. Blacks 3rd ed.

 

Sheadings—A riding, tithing, or division in the Isle of Man, where the whole island is divided into six sheadings, in each of which there is a coroner or chief constable appointed by a delivery of a rod at the Tinewald court or annual convention. King, Isle of Man. 7. Blacks 3rd ed.

 

Riding—Where a county or shire was divided into three intermediate jurisdictions, they were called trithings and were anciently governed by a trithing-reeve. Having survived in the county of York, their name became corrupted into ridings; the north, the east, and the west riding. Ballentine 3rd ed.

 

Tithing—A tenth of a hundred. A hundred was made up of ten tithings, each of which was composed of ten families, and it constituted a governmental district. Ballentine 3rd ed.

 

Tinewald—The ancient parliament or annual convention in the Isle of Man, held upon Midsummer-day, at St. John’s chapel. Black’s 3rd ed.

 

This (isle of Man [island of Dr. Moro]) being where the mixing of individuals took place, is also where the judicial districts of tens was lived. [Mexico (Mix-i-co) is were the educating of persons happened, the “ish” person.

 

-Ish: Of, pertaining to, belonging to; Characteristic of; Having the qualities of; Approximately; somewhat.

American heritage dictionary

 

Person—A man considered according to the rank he holds in society…

 

Man—A human being. A person of the male sex. A male of the human species above the age of puberty.

 

Human being—A monster.

 

Monster—A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. “A monster… hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land, albeit it be brought forth in marriage; but, although it hath deformity in any part of its body, yet if it hath human shape, it may be heir. Ballentine 3rd ed.

 

Sex—The physical difference between male and female in animals.

In the human species the male is called man, and the female woman.

 

Human— Of, relating to, or characteristic of human beings. A person. 

Species— A sort, a kind, a class subordinate to a genus, which is a class embracing many species. The expression “an animal of the horse species” would, therefore, only include the animals known as stallions, geldings, mares, fillies and colts. Ballentine 3rd ed.

Male—Of the masculine sex; of the sex that begets young; the sex opposed to the female.

 

The genus, the “ish” one, a noble. While the man is but a monster.

 

In all the dictionaries I have searched I have not been unsuccessful in finding the tern England. But, as often the case one can get the meaning from terms of like kind:

 

English— Of, pertaining to, derived from, or characteristic of England and its inhabitants. The people of

England. The Germanic language of the people of Britain, the United States, and many other

countries.

 

Citizen—Free persons of color, born in the United States were always regarded as citizens; but the child of a member of one of the Indian tribes within the United States is not a citizen though born in the United States; and although the parents have given up their tribal relations they cannot become citizens until they are first naturalized; the descendants of the aborigines are not entitled to the rights of citizens. See Supra  Bouv.

 

Supra—Above; over. Bouv.

 

Color—An appearance, semblance or  simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facie or

apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance etc..

 

Also means the dark color of the skin showing the presence of negro blood, and hence it is equivalent to

African descent or parentage. Blacks 3rd ed.

 

Negro—a black man, one descended from the African race… term “negromeans necessarily person of color, but not every person of color is “negro”. Blacks 3rd ed.

 

 

Free white person—…referred to in Naturalization Act, as amended by Act July 14, 1870, …meaning all persons belonging to the European races then commonly counted as white, and their descendants, including such descendants in other countries to which they have emigrated.

 

…It includes the mixed Latin, Celtic-Ibreain, and Moorish inhabitants of Spain and Portugal, the mixed Greek, Latin, Phoenician, and North African inhabitants of South Russia. It does not mean Caucasian race, Aryan race, or Indo-European races, nor the mixed Indo-European, Dravidian, Semitic and Mongolian peoples who inhabit Persia. A Syrian of Asiatic birth and descent will not be entitled to become a naturalized citizen of the United States as being a free white personBlacks 3rd ed.

 

Because the “ish” person had Moor blood flowing through their veins, they were termed free white persons. It only makes sense that a white person either free or not is of these persons, therefore a Caucasian.

 

Caucasian—Pertaining to the white race, to which belong the greater part of European nations and those of western Asia. The term is inapplicable to denote families or stocks inhabiting Europe, and speaking either the so-called Aryan or Semitic languagesBlacks 3rd ed.

 

White Race—Within the meaning of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890, § 207, providing that there shall be separate schools for the white and colored races, the Caucasian race; –the term “colored races,” being used in contradiction to the white race, and embracing all other races. Rice v. Gong Lum 139 Miss. 760, 104 So. 105, 107.  Blacks 3rd ed.

 

 

 

In American constitutional law the word “state” is applied to the several members of the American Union, while the word “nation” is applied to the whole body of the people embraced within the jurisdiction of the federal government. Bouv.

 

State government. This word is used in various senses. In its most enlarged sense, it signifies a self-sufficient body of persons united together in one community for the defence of their rights, and to do right and justice to foreigners. In this sense, the state means the whole people united into one body politic; (q. v.) and the state, and the people of the state, are equivalent expressions. 1 Pet. Cond. Rep. 37 to 39; 3 Dall. 93; 2 Dall. 425; 2 Wilson’s Lect. 120; Dane’s Appx. _50, p. 63 1 Story, Const. _361. In a more limited sense, the word `state’ expresses merely the positive or actual organization of the legislative, or judicial powers; thus the actual government of the state is designated by the name of the state; hence the expression, the state has passed such a law, or prohibited such an act. State also means the section of territory occupied by a state, as the state of Pennsylvania.

The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. [1] It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. [2] It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or [3] it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. [Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)]

The federal zone over which the sovereignty of the United States2 extends is the District of Columbia, the territories and possessions belonging to Congress, and a limited amount of land within the States of the Union, called federal “enclaves.

District of Columbia—A portion of the country, originally ten miles square, which was ceded to the United States by the states of Virginia and Maryland, over which the national government  has exclusive jurisdiction.

 

By the word state is also meant, more particularly, one of the commonwealths which form the United States of Americathe corporation of the electors – the State of…

The district of Columbia and the territorial districts of the United States, are not states within the meaning of the constitution and of the judiciary act, so as to enable a citizen thereof to sue a citizen of one of the states in the federal courts. 2 Cranch, 445; 1 Wheat. 91.

The several states composing the United States are sovereign and independent, in all things not surrendered to the national government by the constitution, and are considered, on general principles, by each other as foreign states, yet their mutual relations are rather those of domestic independence, than of foreign alienation. 7 Cranch, 481; 3 Wheat. 324; 1 Greenl. Ev. _489, 504. Vide, generally, Mr. Madison’s report in the legislature of Virginia, January, 1800; 1 Story’s Com. on Const. _208; 1 Kent, Com. 189, note b; Grotius, B. 1, c. 1, s. 14; Id. B. 3, c. 3, s. 2; Burlamaqui, vol. 2, pt. 1, c. 4, s. 9; Vattel, B. 1, c. 1; 1 Toull. n. 202, note 1 Nation; Cicer. de Repub. 1. 1, s. 25.

 

Family of nations—…is an aggregate of states which as the results of their historical antecedents have inherited a common civilization, and are at a similar level of moral and political opinion. Blacks 7th ed.

 

Again with definition:

 

Fimily of nations—…is an aggregate (composed of several) of states (a political community organized under a distinct government recognized and confirmed  by its citizens and subjects as a supreme power) which as the results of their historical antecedents (prior in point of time) have inherited a common (capable of being inherited) civilization (a law; …covers several states of society), and are at a similar level of moral  (general principals of right conduct) and political opinion (view of government). Blacks 7th ed.

 

 

http://www.marstongroup.co.uk/debtors_make_payment_high_court_writ.aspx

 

After the human-being take over they tried to come with this:

 

DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. This is a state paper issued by the congress of the United States of America, in the name and by the authority of the people, on the fourth day of July, 1776, wherein are set forth:

Certain natural and unalienable rights of man; the uses and purposes of governments the right of the people to institute or to abolish them; the sufferings of the colonies, and their right to withdraw from the tyranny of the king of Great Britain.

The various acts of tyranny of the British Icing.

The petitions for redress of these injuries, and the refusal. to redress them; the recital of an appeal to the people of “Great Britain, and of their being deaf to the voice of justice and consanguinity.

An appeal to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of the intentions of the representatives.

A declaration that the United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all political connexion between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be dissolved.

A pledge by the representatives to each other, of their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

The effect of this declaration was the establishment of the government of the United States as free and independent and thenceforth the people of Great Britain have been held, as the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

 

However, this was not approved, and thus nothing changed.

 

 

United States—The Federal government was created in 1777 by the union of thirteen colonies of Great Britain in “certain articles of confederation and perpetual union,” the first one of which declared that the stile of this confederacy shall be the United States of America.” Each member of the confederacy was denominated a state.” The confederacy, owing to well-known historical reasons, having proven a failure, a new Constitution was formed in 1787, by “the people of the United States” “for the United States of America,” as its preamble declares. Ballentine 3rd ed.

 

United States citizen—The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who hold the power and conduct the government through their representatives. They are the “sovereign people,” and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty. Every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States, and needs no naturalization. A person born outside of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized. Ballentine 3rd ed.

 

 

United Kingdom—Great Britain and Ireland. Ballentine 3rd ed.

 

Popular use: The occasional and precarious enjoyment of property by the members of society in their individual capacity, without the power to enforce such enjoyment according to law. Bouv.

 

Popular government: A government wherein the body of the nation keeps in its own hands the empire, or the right of command. The government of the United States is such a government. Ballentine 3rd ed.

 

 

 

This body described above is none other than the Moorish of Europe, the mixed bloods who have been given a certain portion of land here on this continent to do trade with the aborigines/Muurs. The face of Europe today is the evidence of the slaughter which took place and displaced those Moors/Kings there, just as it was done here on Turtle Island. The creature “man” then took over. We Washitaw Muurs/Moorish Americans and our British brothers the Moors/Mooes had a civil war amongst each other over the issue of the Caucasian slaves. We Washitaw enslaved no one, but our British brothers did. For they could not see that the Caucasian should be free as they new them in their animal state and could not see them past that. Unless be it by marriage and having no deformity. There are 9 Moorish Presidents before Washington that are noted in history. Washington was the first Caucasian president of the United States. Therefore, even this government was one of Moorish foundation until they were illegally taken over by the Caucasian race who assume power by way of color, thus being defacto. Wahsington – “I cannot tell a lie, I did chop down the cherry tree”. While we fought they plotted. The prisons of Europe were opened for those in them to come here.

 

Black Person—“Black person,” occurring in Constitution and laws, must be taken in its generic sense as contra-distinguished from whiteBlacks 3rd ed.

 

Negro—The word “negro” means a black man, one descended from the African race, and does not commonly include a mulatto. Blacks 3rd ed

 

What African race is THE African race of which this Negro is descended from??

 

I have not found African in the dictionaries of law, therefore we turn to the American Heritage dictionary for further clarification:

 

African— Of or pertaining to Africa or any of its peoples or languages. A person born or living in Africa.

 

Afrikaans—A language that developed from 17th century Dutch and is an official language of the Republic of South Africa.

 

Afrikaner—An Afrikaans-speaking descendant of the Dutch settlers of South Africa.

 

Dutch—Of or pertaining to the Netherlands, its inhabitants, or their language.  German. The Germans.

 

The word German comes from the word germ:

 

germ—A small organic structure or cell from which a new organism may develop. Something that may serve as the basis of further growth or development.

 

german—Having the same parents, or having the same grandparents on one side.

 

Note that these two terms are lower case just as they appeared in the dictionary. The term german is also found there but like German. Draw your conclusion.

 

African descent— … members of the races of Africa or their descendants by intermixture with races constituting free white persons, the negro races referred to being those from which the emancipated slaves in the United States descend. Blacks 3rd ed.

 

So these germs, Afrikaans, Black persons, monsters, human-beings, have no standing in law, therefore, they went to war with their masters, the Moors. They were governed by Black Codes which they turned and used on their masters and took the names and titles which belonged to these Moors. It appears that the mindset of supremacy is alive and well today. The Moors once ruled the world, it only makes since that a supremacy group are who they encountered that made war with them.

 

WAR. A contention by force; or the art of paralysing the forces of an enemy.

Public war is either civil or national. Civil war is that which is waged between two parties, citizens or members of the same state or nation. National war is a contest between two or more independent nations carried on by au-thority of their respective governments.

 

In the above term Inhabitant, it mentions the aborigines, being, in general, not citizens of the United States and in the term citizen, identifies them as being alike but separate from the Indians though they were commonly called Indians. Let’s examine:

 

Tribes—See Five Civilized Nations. Bouv.

 

Five Civilized Nations—Several of the more powerful Indian tribes occupying the Indian Territory, known as the “five civilized nations”, namely the Cherokees, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creeks and Siminoles, and the tribes incorporated into these nations… Bouv.

 

Indian—The name of the aboriginal inhabitants of America. It was ruled that the Cherokee nation in Georgia was a distinct community. Bouv.

 

Indian Tribe—A separate and distinct community or body of the aboriginal Indian race of men found in the

*United States.

 

Several Indian Tribes within the limits of the United States have an organized government. See

Choctaw Nation, Chickasaw Nation, Cherokee Nation.

 

The policy of congress is to vest in the courts of the Cherokee nation jurisdiction of all

 controversies between Indians, or in which a member of the nation is the only party. Bouv.

 

Distinct—Clear to the senses or mind; easily understood or perceived; plain; unmistakable.

Evidently not identical; observably or decidedly different. Bouv.

 

Several—Separate, distinct. Bouv.

 

Cherokee Nation—A tribe of Iroquoian Indians formerly occupying northern Georgia , but now dwelling in

Oklahoma; the most enlightened of the Indian peoples of America. Bouv.

 

So, according to the terms above, an Indian is one of this separate and distinct body of aboriginal men, and not of all the other Tribes but of a particular body of men called aborigines.

 

Nation—A people, or aggregation of men, existing in the form of an organized jural society, usually inhabiting a distinct portion of the earth, speaking the same language, using the same customs, possessing historic continuity, and distinguished from other like groups by their racial origin and characteristics, and generally, but not necessarily, living under the same government and sovereignty.

 

Besides the element of autonomy or self-government, that is, the independence of the community as a whole from the interference of any foreign power in its affairs or any subjection to such power, if is further necessary  to the constitution of a nation that it should be an organized jural society, that is, both governing its own members by regular laws and defining and protecting their rights, and respecting the rights and duties which attach to it as a constituent member of the family of nations. Such a society, says Vattel, has her affairs and her interest; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person, who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights.

 

a nation is destined to form only one state, and that it constitute one indivisible whole.

 

A free nation is one not subject to a foreign government, whatever the constitution of the state. The nation is a moral body, independent of political revolutions. Because it is constituted by inborn qualities which render it indissoluble.

 

Foreign Country. A foreign country is any territory (including the air space, territorial waters, seabed, and subsoil) under the sovereignty of a government other than the United States2. It does not include U.S.2 possessions or territories.

 

National—Pertaining or relating to a nation as a whole. Bouv.

 

Naturalization—The act by which an alien is made a citizen of the United States of America.

The act of adopting a foreigner and clothing him with all the privileges of a native-born 

citizen.

                          A nation, or the sovereign who represents it, may grant to a stranger the quality of a citizen, by

admitting him into the body of the political society. This is called naturalization.

It is believed that every state in the Christendom accords to foreigners , with more or less

restrictions, the right of naturalization, and that each has some positive law or mode of its own

for naturalizing the native-born subjects of other states, without reference to the consent of the

latter for the release of the transfer of the allegiance of such subjects.

The fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution provides that “all persons born or

naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United

States and of the state where in they reside.”

It affirms the ancient rule of citizenship by birth, within the territory, in the allegiance, and

under the protection of the country, including all children here born of resident aliens, with the

                          exception of the children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, … children

                          of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes

At common law a natural-born subject included every child born in England of alien parents

It made no difference whether the parents were permanently or only temporary residing in

England.

By act of April 14, 1802, congress has conferred power to naturalize upon state courts

                         having common-law jurisdiction and a seal and clerk.

the certificate of naturalization issued by a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive proof

 of the citizenship of the person named therein. ..though not the only proof. The judgment of the

court, like every judgment, has been decided to be complete evidence of its own validity.

When no record can be produced showing the naturalization of a foreigner, naturalization may

be inferred form the fact that for a lone time he voted, held office, and exercised all the rights

and privileges of a citizen.

 

 

Allegiance—The tie that binds the citizen to the government, in return for the protection which the government

affords him.

 

Natural allegiance is that which results from the birth of a person within the territory and

                     under obedience of the government.

 

At common law, in England and America, natural allegiance could not be renounced except by

 permission of the government.

 

Expatriation—The voluntary act of abandoning one’s country and becoming the citizen or subject of another.

…the act of July 27, 1868, which declares the right of expatriation to be the inherent right of all people, disavows the claim made by foreign states that naturalized American citizens are still subjects of such states, and extends to such naturalized citizens, whine in foreign countries, the same protection accords to native-born citizens. Since the passage of this act, the United States has entered into treaties with nearly all the nations of Europe by which the contracting powers mutually concede to subjects and citizens the right of expatriation on conditions and under qualifications.

 

So, for you Washitaw Muurs/Moorish Americans, there is no expatriation because you cannot or are not entitled to be citizens of the United States because you are not entitled to their rights. Yaaee,,, Why, because you are Supra – Above and Over! You are not subject to it, You are the sovereign of the land. You do not get permission from that which is beneath you, you control it as it must only exist for your benefit!

 

COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member.

Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence. See Allegiance; Citizen; Expatriation. in another sense, country is the same as pais. (q. v.) Bouv.

 

So these “Negros” who took over, tried to expatriate by drawing up a declaration of independence, which was not honored, thus years later about 1898, they drew up the declaration of white independence which was also denied.

‘White Declaration of Independence’

 

“First That the time has passed for the intelligent citizens of the community owning 90% of the property and paying taxes in like proportion, to be ruled by negroes.

“Second That we will not tolerate the action of unscrupulous white men in affiliating with the negroes so that by means of their votes they can dominate the intelligent and thrifty element in the community, thus causing business to stagnate and progress to be out of the question.

 

“Third That the negro has demonstrated by antagonizing our interest in every way, and especially by his ballot, that he is incapable of realizing that his interests are and should be identical with those of the community. …

 

[Note: they left the Fourth out?]

 

“Fifth That we propose in the future to give to white men a large part of the employment heretofore given to negroes …

 

“Sixth We are prepared to treat the negroes with justice and consideration in all matters which do not involve sacrifices of the interest of the intelligent and progressive portion of the community. But are equally prepared now and immediately to enforce what we know to be our rights.

 

“Seventh That we have been, in our desire for harmony and peace, blinded both to our best interests and our rights. A climax was reached when the negro paper of this city published an article so vile and slanderous that it would in most communities have resulted in the lynching of the editor. We deprecate lynching and yet there is no punishment, provided by the courts, adequate for this offense. We therefore owe it to the people of this community and of this city, as a protection against such license in the future, that the paper known as the “Record” cease to be published and that its editor [Alexander Manly] be banished from this community.” 

 

 

JURY. A body of men selected according to law, for the purpose of deciding some controversy.

This mode of trial by jury was adopted soon after the conquest of England, by William, and was fully established for the trial of civil suits in the reign of Henry II. Crabb’s C. L. 50, 61. Bouv. 

 [C]ongress must be considered in two distinct characters. In one character as legislating for the states; in the other, as a local legislature for the district. In the latter character, it is admitted, the power of levying direct taxes may be exercised; but, it is contended, for district purposes only, in like manner as the legislature of a state may tax the people of a state for state purposes. Without inquiring at present into the soundness of this distinction, its possible influence on the application in this district of the first article of the constitution, and of several of the amendments, may not be altogether unworthy of consideration. [Loughborough vs Blake, 15 U.S. (5 Wheat.) 317 – 5 L.Ed. 98 (1820)]

 

Uniform Probate Code, Section 1-201(40) defines a federal state: Any state of the United States2, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession subject to the legislative authority of the United States.

 

IRC 4612(a)(4)(A): (A) In General. — The term “United States” means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. .

 

IRC 6103(b)(5): (5) State — The term “State” means —

(A) any of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Canal Zone, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

 

When reading the various acts of Congress which had declared various people to be “citizens of the United States”, it is immediately apparent that many are simply declared “citizens of the United States3while others are declared to be “citizens of the United States2, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States2.” The difference is that the first class of citizen arises when that person is born out of the territorial jurisdiction of the United States2 Government. 3A Am Jur 1420, Aliens and Citizens, explains: “A Person is born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States2, for purposes of acquiring citizenship at birth, if his birth occurs in territory over which the United States2 is sovereign …”

 

Where you born in a hospital? Do you have a birth certificate? If so,, you’ve been naturalized by aliens. If you be Washitaw, then those documents are null and void.

“A great nation is not conquered until it is first destroyed from within”

 

This brings me to the conclusion: ALL SO CALLED PEOPLE OF COLOR ARE DESCENDANT MUURS, WE ARE ONE, WHO HAVE BEEN DIVIDED, SO AS TO CONQUER AND DESTROY SO THE OCCUPATION MAY CONTINUE!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cherokee Timeline

1540-1

0.                                                   deSoto “visits” the Cherokee and is supposedly one of the first whites seen by the tribe, although written descriptions of the tribe by the Spanish note the wide range of colors in the tribe, fromnegro” (black) to light skinned and “fair,” according to Moyano and Pardo.

 

These Cherokee were/are of the Washitaw Peoples.

 

Washitaw Indians

Washitaw, Yamasee, Iroquois, Cherokee

Blackfoot, Pequot & Mohegan

(and/or All Indigenous Aborigines of America)

 

The statistics state only .05% or 1/2 of 1% of all Indigenous people of North and South America are in existence as a result of Christopher Columbus and his Indo-European travelers’ conquests.  If there were 1,000 Indians at the time of Indo-European arrival, what’s left of that number in 2006 are 5 Native Americans.  Ninety-five (95%) percent were massacred by Columbus and his Indo-European crews shortly after 1492.  Around 1900, it was thought Native Americans were on the brink of extinction with only 250,000 left.  I would like to share a picture from my family.  This is a picture of a relative who was a Michigan Chippewa Indian from the Reservation in Mt. Pleasant, MI, taken in the 1800’s.  It is true that Native Americans harbored runaway slaves, but the lady pictured at the right was already in Michigan before the slaves migrated as free people. I don’t think it matters whether Native Americans are Washitaw or Lumbee from North Carolina or Chippewa from Michigan.  All tribes have Black Roots.  The phenotypes of Native Americans point to the theories held by Diop and Van Sertima.  What this amounts too are further discrepancies in what is written in our history books.  Even though the evidence is right here and pushed in a person’s face, there are those who still believe the “Old Guard.”

 

 

Have you been to a Pow Wow?  I have been and was astonished at all of the Black Native Americans.  The pow wows I have attended were in Michigan and Ohio.  Those Native Americans did not harbor runaway slaves which led me to believe the following:  Black Indians are not solely a result of African slaves mixing with so-called Red Indians who were fleeing from slavery as many documented sources would have you to believe. Black Indians are indigenous to America—North, South, and Central before the so-called Red Man, before the Indo-Europeans, before the so-called Bering Strait crossings.  The Olmecs, Washitaw, Moors, Yamasee, Mound Builders planted the seed of civilization in the Americas—Black Indians!”

 

    

                                                Otter Belt               A Medicine              Crow King

Comanche                   Man                          Sioux 

Skulls shed new light on migration to Americas 

Cranial shapes hint at two separate waves of settlers

(Life Science 2005)

 

It is recorded in history books the first group of people to populate North and South America crossed over from Siberia by way of the Bering Strait on a land-ice bridge.  Research by authors like Van Sertima and Rogers have already confirmed what is now considered a new revelation set forth by Indo-Euro-American Scientists.  Here we go again—VALIDATION by Indo-Euro-Americans.  After examining a collection of South American skulls, research indicates that a different population crossed the bridge to America 3,000 years before that first crossing from Siberia.

 

Indo-Euro-American Scientists have now discovered skulls in South America that look like indigenous Australians, Melanesians and Sub-Saharan Africans more than Northern Asians—THE GIANT OLEMEC HEADS CAME FROM—WAKE UP!  Scientists compared 81 skulls from the Lagoa Santa Region of Brazil to worldwide data on human variation.

 

The information indicates the skulls — dating between 7,500 and 11,000 years ago — were not anomalies but supports the hypothesis that two distinct populations colonized the Americas.  The skulls of Aboriginal of America and Northern Asians generally feature short, wide craniums, a broader face and high, narrow eye sockets and noses.  This particular collection is remarkably different.

 

The skulls belonging to the earliest known South Americans — the Paleo-Indians — had long, narrow craniums, projecting jaws and low, broad eye sockets and noses. Drastically different from aboriginal America Indians, these skulls appear more similar to modern Australians, Melanesians and sub-Saharan Africans.

 

The research was published online by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and appeared in the Dec. 2005 issue of the journal.

 

    

                Tlapacoyan, Mexico           Oaxaca, Mexico            Veracruz, Mexico

100 – 1000 BC                400 BC – 100 AD              300 – 700 AD

(von Wuthenau 1969)      (von Wuthenau 1975)    (von Wuthenau 1969)

 

 

                                Burrows Cave Illinois             Ancient Negroid

                                       basalt mask

                                                                                                 Canada  (1879)

 

Over 200,000 ancient pyramids and huge mounds of the Earth in the shape of cones, animals and geometric designs can still be found from the southern coast of America to Canada. These structures were built by people known as “The Mound Builders.”  They were dark-skinned woolly-haired Blacks who were aboriginal to North America  and kin to the Olmecs of South America.

 

During Pangea, the Afrikan and American continents were joined. The Black Mound Builders were the Washitaw-Muurs (Ouachita-Moors), the ORIGINAL inhabitants of North and South America.  Columbus was not entirely wrong in calling these people “Indians”!  The true meaning of word “Indian” is (“INDI” meaning black, as in INDIa ink, hINDu and INDIgo the darkest color of the color spectrum). The massive remains of this ancient BLACK civilization /empire still stand in both North and South America.

 

Ivan Van Sertima writes about the reported: “Evidence for black-skinned natives in the Americas long before the arrival of Columbus Ancient American Magazine (Issue 17), From the distinctly Negroid features of colossal Olmec sculpted heads and a pre-Aztec obsidian bowl being upheld by a figure with unmistakably black characteristics, to the bones of Negroid persons excavated from a 2,000 year-old mound in northern Wisconsin, a wealth of material exists to establish the certainty of non-Caucasian, non-Indian population living in pre-Columbian America along with these other groups.” Many Mound Builders were huge; their ancient skeletons were often 7 to 8 feet. The only other living people on Earth this tall are another group of Blacks, the Massai of Afrika.

 

Many details are available in “Return of the Ancient Ones,” a book by the Empress of the Washitaw, Verdiacee ‘Tiari’ Washitaw-Turner Goston El-Bey. She is the Empress and Head of the present-day Washitaw Nation in Louisiana, which is recognized by the United Nations.

 

 

 

 

The earliest people in the Americas were people of the Negritic African race.  About 30,000 years ago a worldwide maritime undertaking included journeys from the Sahara towards the Indian Ocean and the Pacific, and from West Africa across the Atlantic Ocean towards the Americas. According to the Gladwin Thesis, (outlined on http://RaceandHistory.com) this ancient journey occurred, particularly about 75,000 years ago and included so called Black Pygmies, Black Negritic peoples and Black Australoids similar to the Aboriginal Black people of Australia and parts of Asia, including India.

 

Ancient ABORIGINAL Moor Nations of America before and after Columbus include:

 

0.                                                   The Washitaw of the Louisiana/Midwest

0.                                                   The Yamasee of the South East

0.                                                   The Iroquois

0.                                                   The Cherokee Indians

0.                                                   The Blackfoot Indians

0.                                                   The Pequot and Mohegans of Connecticut

0.                                                   The Black Californians (Calafians) (CAL in CALifornia literally means BLAK, after the name of

0.                                                          the Great Mamma KALi / Queen KALifa)

0.                                                   The Olmecs of Mexico

0.

The Darienite of Panama – A number of Black Negroid Peoples are mentioned in the works of I. Rafinesque (“Black Nations of America,” Atlantic Journal and Friend Knowledge; Philadelphia 1832; p. 86: Also I. Rafinesque, pgs. 121, 186, 187, 194, 208, 209). Rafinesque was a naturalist who explored and took accurate documentation of his works through out the U.S. In mentioning Negroes, Blacks, Moors, Ethiopians….explorers such as Rafinesque referred to Negro Black Africans, not dark skinned “Indians.”

 

 

INGO HEAD IN 14TH CENTURY   An early Black Californian, a member of the

MEXICO.                                original Black aboriginal people of

MADE BY THE MIXTECS               California and the South Western U.S.

 

 

THE WASHITAW PEOPLE

The Oldest Indigenous Peoples On Earth
 The Washitaw de Muu & The Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah
 WASHITAW MUURS – THE ORIGINAL AMA-ZON WOMEN

On the 2nd of Muu, ( twenty five thousand years ago ), the Washitaw people decided to leave their native land of Muu. Muu had become decadent and power hungry, but the Washitaw were a peaceful, righteous and honorable family. A matriarchal society since the time of the Empress Ismaale’. The Great Amazon warrior of Muu, it is estimated that her reign began some one hundred thousand years ago. The ancient Washitaw were musicians, historians, herbalists and architects. Their reputations reached far and near. After millennia of spiritual and physical wealth and abundance, wars and significant differences began to occur between neighbors. Forbidden technological powers were used to destroy one another.

The Washitaw Empire has been traditionally been ruled by intuitive and spiritual women with the bloodline dating back to “The Great Empress” Ismaale’ of Muu Proper.

Empress Ui Ua, the new leader of the Washitaw de 2nd of Muu had very powerful intuitive powers. She saw the impending doom for her homeland (Muu). She began to send the architects and their families East to the Holy Land called Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah to survey and construct living quarters, business offices, burial chambers and a National Infrastructure for the coming migration of the Washitaw multitudes. Thus, the pyramids and mounds of Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah (now known as the U.S.A) were constructed. Mounds and pyramids can be found throughout the Ohio Valley, the Tennessee valley, the Mississippi Valley and in the Grand Canyon.

We are the aborigines, or as Lewis and Clark called us, the black and brown, bushy-headed original inhabitants of North America. The Washitaw and Tunica families carry the Emperial bloodline.

The Caucasians took control of our lives and forced us to take on the names Washington and Turner.

Washitaw in English is “The Green Land”.

In the ancient hieroglyphics of Kemit (Egypt) The Green Land” was Uatchita (the original name for the Nile Delta).

The Washitaw Empire has a legacy of over 100.000 years of rulership by Empresses. Her Majestic Highness Verdiacee Tiara Washitaw-Turner (Tunica) Goston El-Bey is the reigning Empress of the Washitaw Muur Nation. She is the legal heir to the Maison Rouge land grants that were skillfully willed to her great-grandfather Henry Turner, son of the Marquis Maison Rouge.

The Marquis Joseph de Maison Rouge was the child of French nobility who was rescued by the Baron de Bastrop during the French Revolution The King of Spain, uncle of the Maison Rouge made the deal to transport his nephew to the “new world” for fear of his life.

While exiled here in Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah, the Marquis married into the Emperial family of the Washitaw. Being a knight in the order of the religion of St. John, his marriage could never be accepted by the Roman Catholic church. Henry Turner was the child of the Marquis de Maison Rouge and the Empress Ayahmareeyah. After the Marquis’ death, Henry Turner recovered all the titles to his father’s land.

Empress Delphi Kimm Washington-Washitaw (1849-1966) reigned during the turbulent years of legal land reclamation.

Many accounts confuse us as descendants of the Mongolians and Siberians who invaded from across the Bering Strait. Yet our oral traditions tell us we have been in Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah for at least 25,000 years and we fought long and bitter wars against those killing machines from the east. When the creature man arrived the wars were 2000 years old. The Caucasian (the Creature Man), the Mongolian and Siberian (later known as the Red Man) joined forces to attempt the complete destruction and obliteration of the Black and Brown Washitaw and Tunica people. The Great War goes on to this day.

We black and brown and white and red people living right here on this land must wake up to the lies that have encrusted us with totally fabricated misinformation as a foundation for all the assumptions that we as human beings instinctively make.

The Name of this land called The United States of America is Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah

 

 

The Ancient Ones

Over 11,500 years ago,

Before the United States,

Prior to the British Empire,

Before Columbus’ “discovery” of “America”,

Before the Dark Age of Europe,

Prior to the births of Mohammed or Jesus,

Predating the Roman and Greek Empires,

 

Before King Tutankhamun was a twinkle in his mother’s eye,

There existed a civilization in the “New World” known as Empire Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah.  It is for this reason that the Washitaw People have been recognized as the “Oldest Indigenous People on Earth” !

 

Originally the race of dark-skinned aborigines of Mu.  The Washitaw once inhabited lands now beneath water or raised upon mountains by natures forces.  They are most notably recognized as the peoples who constructed the earthen mounds and stone pyramids of North, Central and South “America”. They are the parent of all mound build_ing and pyramid building cultures – worldwide.

 

For millennia, the Washitaw peoples lived in relative peace.  This statement does not and is not meant to imply that there was never a dispute or that people never fought, but the Empire, ruled by its hereditary Empresses, survived any and all civil incursions.

 

1492 c.e. – Though other Caucasians had long before “found” the “New World”, Columbus is generally given credit for “discovering” the continent.  Beyond the fact that what he landed on were only barrier islands (no, he never came to the mainland), his “discovery” was not a surprise to the millions of inhabitants of these great land masses, nor his navigator who had the already ancient map of how to get here.

 

Upon what is commonly known as the “Americas” was a thriving Empire.  All the races had a presence and a place.  The “tribes” were a series of nation-states, family groups, or colonies which were residing within the Empire and under the rule of its hereditary Empresses.  Trade thrived across the three continents – commercialism at its best.  The Washitaw were, generally, a peaceful people (though as with all gatherings of human beings, disagreements and occasional greed did occur).  As an Empire, there was no military and no police force – only those designated to deal with the safety and security of the Empire.

 

With Columbus’ arrival, however, this peaceful Empire would be torn apart – but not destroyed.

 

The Caucasians’ incursions into Emperial Territory began bloody and that bloodshed has not abated.  Columbus himself began it with his mis-use and abuse of the aboriginal people to support the Caucasians’ greed for gold.  This expanded with later “explorers” and “conquerors” who could never sate their lust for gold, new and rare woods, tobacco, furs and other goods found only within the Washitaw Empire.  These “explorers” eventually even had the audacity to enslave the aborigninal peoples and to start laying claim to these lands for the Indo-European (Cacasian) Nations despite the fact that all the land was widely recognized as owned by the Empress of the Washitaw.

 

Eventually, Indo-European monarchs saw a way to rid themselves of some of their unwanted subjects.  They would lay claim to a piece of Washitaw land (either by claiming a relatively empty piece of land – or more often murdering its indigenous inhabitants) and then empty their debtor’s prisons or chase away unwanted religious or other creatures. The Georgia colony (no relation to the location “claimed“ today), for example, was a penal colony – used to empty England’s debtor’s prisons.  Other areas were settled by “Puritans” who left England because they could not expound their own brand of theology on all who surrounded them.  These so-called colonies (limited to 50 square miles of land each) never owned the lands they were squatting on; and ALL were confined to the area then known as “New England”.

 

 

A few came because they saw a chance at quick wealth; and would get it no matter the cost to the lives of the indigenous native population or the land’s resources…which continues to this day.

 

These people and their Monarchs settled themselves and colonized these Washitaw lands without treating with the land-owner (The Empress of the Washitaw), without any formal agreement.  They claimed, after the fact, to have bought land from the indigenous aboriginal populations, though they were well aware these populations didn’t even own the land themselves – they only leased it from The Empress, the Lawful land owner!  More simply put, these “colonists” were the homeless, outcasts and outlaws of foreign continents who, having set up their tents and planted their flags on the Private Lands of the Empress of the Washitaw, decided that because they were there and had superior weapons and were willing and ready to kill the indigenous aboringinal population and were “superior” (in their somewhat deranged logic), they had the right to take all that surrounded them – even if that meant genocide.  A logic and activity which continues to this day.

 

Ultimately two monarchs diverged along two completely different paths—one forcing, the other securing a place within the Washitaw Empire borders, and keeping themselves on Washitaw lands.

 

England’s George III saw a great opportunity.  The alleged crown “colonies” of the “New World” were in an uproar over what they saw as mal-treatment by the English parliament (recall “Taxation Without Representation”).  Revolution was brewing and George saw a way to make it pay profits to himself and his descendants; and use Washitaw to fight Washitaw.  Playing on the greed of some Washitaw tribes; and with the assistance of several leaders within his colonies, George initiated a plan for the murder of the aboriginal Washitaw peoples and occupation of the Washitaw Emperial lands.

 

First, George played himself and Parliament against his colonies.  In the “war” which ensued, he hired Hessan (German) mercenaries to fight (to minimize British casualties).  He also managed to get both sides to hire so-called “Indians” (traitors of the Washitaw Empire) to fight against their two sides and each other – further reducing the aboriginal indigenous population.

 

Finally, after his alleged “colonies” had declared “independence” he arranged it so that this new “united states of America” placed within their own by-laws (the so-called Articles of Confederation, alleged Declaration of Independence and Corporate Charter known as The Constitution for the United States of America 1787) phrases preserving the obligations of contracts made prior to the “revolution”.  Since all the colonies existed by contract with their King and since all trade from and to those colonies was by contract with their King, the ultimate outcome was that the colonies were newly named and no longer subject to Parliament; but, were instead “corporations” in the sole ownership of George, his family and descendants.

 

The French monarchy took a somewhat different approach.  Early on, the French, English, Portuguese, Spanish and others with an interest in this “New World” all took about the same approach.  Take what they want, kill whoever gets in the way..

The product of the English path we’ve already seen.  The French direction changed with the reign of Louis XVI.  Louis was interested in neither politics nor capable of dealing with the revolution which engulfed his reign and himself.  Focused on his family and his leisure activities, he failed to deal effectively with the mounting financial crisis which ultimately brought an end to his reign and himself.

 

His son, Louis XVII, born 27 March 1785, was proclaimed King by royalist exiles after the January 1793 execution of his father.

 

The second son of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, he became heir to the French throne upon the death of his elder brother in 1789.

 

After the monarchy’s overthrow in 1792, he was imprisoned with his family.  In July 1793 he was taken from his family and, for a brief time, placed in the care of one Antoine Simon, a shoemaker.

 

Ultimately, with the aide of the Baron de Bastrop, of Spain, and his Uncles, King Louis XVIII of France (in exile in Rome) and King Charles IV of Spain, he was smuggled from France to the so-called “Louisiana Territory” on Emperial Washitaw lands.  There he married Empress Ayimareeyah of the Washitaw Empire.

 

Unfortunately the British Crown and its possession, the corporate United States, found that through deception, intrigue, fraud, mis- and dis-information they could keep the heirs of the French & Washitaw match from their rightful inheritance.

 

Among the frauds perpetrated by the British Crown, its possession the United States, the “States”, and their agents – witting and unwitting (including, unfortunately, traitors from the Washitaw and some of its tribes/clans/states/families/provinces) are:

 

Ø        Changing the Washitaw Emperial family and other Washitaw names by “Anglicizing“ them; and,

Ø       Drawing and redrawing maps with deliberate “errors” or exploiting previous errors to mislead and misinform;

and,

Ø        “Anglicizing” Washitaw names of cities, provinces, territories, monuments, etc.; and,

Ø       A concerted effort to claim that all inhabitants of these continents crossed the Bering Strait (this fiction has continued despite archaeological and carbon date evidence that complex civilization here predated this “land bridge” and all European “civilization“).

“The Washitaw and Tunica families carry the Emperial bloodline.  After the U.S. came into our land, these names were altered to Washington and Turner.  They also changed the spelling of WASHITAW to OUACHITA, a European misnomer that retained the pronunciation of the original name.  The term ‘Washitaw’, colloquially, has come to mean ANCIENT ONES or the Black ones.  Clearly printed on the original maps of the Spanish land grants, the river name Rio Negro (river of the Blacks) is simultaneously labeled Rio Ouachita (river of the Washitaw).  In the Egyptian (Kemetic) hieroglyphic dictionary, Washitaw appears as WST (USHAUTI, WSHAUTI) AND SBT (SHABTI, SHABAZZ).  Pre-Mayan spellings were UAXACTUN / UAXASAKTUN (WAH-HANK-TOON or WAH-SHAK-TOON).

 

Taken from We Are The Washitaw compiled by Umar Shabazz Bey.  Copyright 1996, Washitaw Publishing Company, Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah.”

 

Disclaimer: This should NOT be construed to mean that all Washitaw were/are black or brown, as has been done in recent years by some self-serving black or brown people.

 

The Washitaw people are of ALL racial colors and characteristics.  Just because the Washitaw Empress is of black skin color (though she carries the blood of many races), some have sought to exploit Her Emperial Highness’ skin color for their own ignorant, misguided, political and greed-motivated agendas.

Further, a concerted effort was made to kill or subjugate the indigenous native populations regardless of their skin color.  Most of the indigenous light-skinned population slowly integrated themselves into Indo-European society, forsaking their heritage in an effort to survive.  A large part of the indigenous population – the “Asian” and mixed race peoples often referred to as the “red man” has been all too well documented.

 

However, the dark-skinned peoples, including the Washitaw Emperial families underwent the most insidious treatment.  By mixing those who were not killed outright with a relatively small number of captives brought from the continent of Africa; by losing and/or destroying records of family lineage; by propagating the myth that all slaves had come from Africa – most of the descendants of the noble Washitaw culture and civilization had their heritage literally erased from their memories.  The Indo-Europeans, who never wanted to believe in a culture or civilization equal to – let alone surpassing – their own, were more than happy to go along with these atrocities and myths.

 

It has taken the reigning hereditary Empress of the Washitaw the majority of Her life to this point to pull together the documentary evidence to prove what She has known from childhood: that the land presently known as North, Central and South America were and are the private property of Her Emperial Highness, held in Sovereign Trust  from the Creator by the hereditary Empresses of the Empire Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah for the Washitaw peoples.

 

Slowly, painstakingly, and despite continuing efforts by the corporate United States, its subsidiary corporate “States” and its witting and yet unwitting agents, She is regaining control of Her land and sovereignty of and for Her People which includes all those born upon the lands of the Empire Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah.  Through the Law of Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice, in the path of Natural Law, and with the help of the Creator, the Empire Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah – this hidden Nation – is rising from the ashes.

Emperial Law
Emperial Law is not, at present, “codified“.  Codification carries with it it’s own dangers (which the courts in the corporate united States and States have proven time and again) as the letter of the Law and/or corrupt “officials” override the spirit of the law.  When a small technicality in procedure can override law and cause the dismissal of an important case; Truth and Justice have been left behind.  However, this fact, some of the basic tenets of and principals of law have been proclaimed even as case law is now being written.

The five basic principals of Natural Law upon which all Emperial Law is based are:

 

Love

Truth

Peace

Freedom

Justice

It is upon these in their pure forms that all activities within Washitaw are to progress.  Further principals which have been laid down include:

 

Þ       No discrimination in any form on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion or the lack thereof, spiritual beliefs or the lack thereof, political views or the lack thereof, nationality, ethnic or cultural background, creed or any other difference which does now or may in the future create a distinction between human beings is permitted.  This extends to all areas of life.

Þ       All people are innocent until proven guilty in an Emperial and/or International Court of Law.

Þ       Violations of any Law in the alleged upholding or “enforcement” of the Law is considered a criminal act, treated and subject to the same justice.

Þ       Any interference in the lives, property, business or other activities of any Washitaw Citizen/citizen by a non-Washitaw governmental “authority” is prohibited.

Þ        Espionage in any form against the Government of the Empire, any Washitaw Citizen/citizen, their property or business is forbidden.

Þ       No sales or other taxes, duties, imposts, governmental fees, etc. shall be applicable with the borders of the Empire and to Washitaw Citizens except those specifically imposed by the Emperial government.

 

Ones must go back to their roots, trace ones genealogy and claim their birthrights from their ancestors. If you are not of the Washitaw nation of families, then you have no lawful claim to land here on this continent called Turtle Island.  Know your roots.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: